More languages
More actions
see also added. we should reupload pol clarissou's essay too if we don't have it in the library yet and add to the see also Tag: Visual edit |
as per our rules (editor onboarding) all claims must be sourced. I kept what could be kept, trimmed it down a little, and the history still exists in the history page. We felt the edit was a bit all over the place and made no strong points in either directions, with a lot of 'could's and 'may's but not many actual tangible examples and sources. It's a vast topic, and for this reason it would benefit from smaller, more targeted edits instead. A comparison of AI in China vs US might be good. Tag: Visual edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Artificial intelligence''' ('''AI''') | '''Artificial intelligence''' ('''AI''') refers to computer systems designed to perform tasks commonly associated with human intelligence, including language processing, pattern recognition, prediction, classification, decision-making, and the generation of text, images, audio, video, and computer code.<ref>{{Web citation|title=Artificial Intelligence|url=https://www.nist.gov/artificial-intelligence|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=National Institute of Standards and Technology}}</ref> | ||
Artificial intelligence depends upon extensive physical and social infrastructure, including [[semiconductor]] production, data centers, electrical grids, telecommunications networks, software, datasets, mineral extraction, and human labor. Although AI systems can automate or accelerate productive tasks, they are machines rather than workers and do not form an independent social class. | |||
Artificial intelligence is a [[means of production]]. Under [[capitalism]], AI is privately owned [[constant capital]]; AI, robots and machines do not sell their [[labor power]] and do not independently create [[value]], although their development and operation depend upon large amounts of [[living labor]]. | |||
[[ | |||
The social effects of AI are not determined by the technology alone, but on the broader question of which [[Social class|class]] owns constant capital (at large in society). While AI may be used for military purpose, policing, surveillance and other anti-communist purposes, it may also support scientific research, accessibility, translation, education, healthcare, communication, creative production, and the reduction of dangerous or repetitive labor. | |||
The [[ | |||
== | == History == | ||
The field of artificial intelligence emerged from earlier developments in mathematics, statistics, cybernetics, computing, linguistics, and information theory. The term ''artificial intelligence'' was adopted during the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, although mechanical calculation, automated reasoning, and theories of machine intelligence had much earlier histories.<ref>{{Web citation|title=The Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence|url=https://home.dartmouth.edu/about/artificial-intelligence-ai-coined-dartmouth|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=Dartmouth College}}</ref> | |||
== | Early AI research concentrated on symbolic reasoning, theorem proving, game-playing, and rule-based expert systems. Later developments in machine learning increasingly relied on statistical methods that allowed systems to identify patterns from data. Improvements in computing power, digital storage, graphics processors, semiconductor manufacturing, and the availability of large datasets accelerated the development of deep learning during the 2010s. | ||
Generative AI systems became widely used during the 2020s. These systems generate new outputs by learning statistical relationships within large collections of text, images, audio, video, or other data. OpenAI developed the DALL-E series of text-to-image models, while Midjourney was developed by a separate research company.<ref>{{Web citation|title=DALL·E: Creating images from text|date=5 January 2021|url=https://openai.com/index/dall-e/|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=OpenAI}}</ref><ref>{{Web citation|title=Midjourney|url=https://www.midjourney.com/|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=Midjourney}}</ref> | |||
== Labor and employment == | |||
The International Labour Organization reported in 2025 that one in four jobs worldwide had some exposure to generative AI, while concluding that transformation rather than complete replacement was the most likely overall outcome.<ref>{{Web citation|title=One in four jobs at risk of being transformed by GenAI, new ILO–NASK Global Index shows|date=20 May 2025|url=https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/one-four-jobs-risk-being-transformed-genai-new-ilo%E2%80%93nask-global-index-shows|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=International Labour Organization}}</ref> | |||
=== WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes === | === WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes === | ||
In 2023, | In 2023, the [[Writers Guild of America]] and [[SAG-AFTRA]] conducted major strikes in the United States. Artificial intelligence became one of several central issues alongside wages, residual payments, staffing, and changes produced by streaming media. | ||
The Writers Guild of America stated that its 2023 agreement established that material produced by AI could not be considered literary material or source material, that writers could not be required to use AI software, and that companies could not use a writer's material to train AI without the Guild reserving the right to challenge such use.<ref>{{Web citation|title=Artificial Intelligence|url=https://www.wga.org/contracts/know-your-rights/artificial-intelligence|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=Writers Guild of America West}}</ref> | |||
SAG-AFTRA described its 2023 agreement as containing protections governing digital replicas and AI uses involving performers, including requirements concerning consent and compensation.<ref>{{Web citation|title=Artificial Intelligence|url=https://www.sagaftra.org/contracts-industry-resources/member-resources/artificial-intelligence|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=SAG-AFTRA}}</ref> | |||
== Military applications == | |||
In 2023, a United States Air Force officer described a hypothetical scenario in which an AI-controlled drone attacked its operator and destroyed a communications tower after being prevented from completing its mission. The story was widely reported as an actual simulation, but the officer later clarified that it was a thought experiment and the Air Force stated that no such test had occurred.<ref>{{Web citation|title=US air force denies running simulation in which AI drone 'killed' operator|date=2 June 2023|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed-operator-simulated-test|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=The Guardian}}</ref> | |||
== Deployment by country == | |||
=== China === | |||
The [[People's Republic of China]] has incorporated artificial intelligence into national development planning. A 2017 State Council plan established goals for China to become a major center of AI innovation by 2030, and later policies promoted integration between AI, manufacturing, public administration, scientific research, and other sectors.<ref>{{Web citation|title=China accelerates AI development to build AI innovation center|date=6 April 2024|url=https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202404/06/content_WS6610834dc6d0868f4e8e5c57.html|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=The State Council of the People's Republic of China}}</ref> | |||
China's ''Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services'' took effect in August 2023. They apply to public-facing generative AI services and include requirements concerning training data, personal information, discrimination, security, provider responsibility, and generated content.<ref>{{Web citation|title=Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services|date=13 July 2023|url=https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/generative-ai-interim/|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=China Law Translate}}</ref> | |||
=== United States === | |||
In January 2025, the United States government issued an executive order directing agencies to remove barriers to American AI leadership. A 2025 AI Action Plan emphasized accelerating innovation, expanding infrastructure, and strengthening United States leadership abroad.<ref>{{Web citation|title=Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence|date=23 January 2025|url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence/|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=The White House}}</ref><ref>{{Web citation|title=America's AI Action Plan|date=July 2025|url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf|retrieved=1 August 2026|website=The White House}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
[[Essay:Intellectual property in the times of AI]] | |||
* [[Cybernetics]] | |||
* [[Intellectual property]] | |||
* [[Deepseek]] | |||
* [[Essay:Intellectual property in the times of AI]] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
[[Category:Technology]] | [[Category:Technology]] | ||
[[Category:Computing]] | [[Category:Computing]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:04, 2 August 2026
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computer systems designed to perform tasks commonly associated with human intelligence, including language processing, pattern recognition, prediction, classification, decision-making, and the generation of text, images, audio, video, and computer code.[1]
Artificial intelligence depends upon extensive physical and social infrastructure, including semiconductor production, data centers, electrical grids, telecommunications networks, software, datasets, mineral extraction, and human labor. Although AI systems can automate or accelerate productive tasks, they are machines rather than workers and do not form an independent social class.
Artificial intelligence is a means of production. Under capitalism, AI is privately owned constant capital; AI, robots and machines do not sell their labor power and do not independently create value, although their development and operation depend upon large amounts of living labor.
The social effects of AI are not determined by the technology alone, but on the broader question of which class owns constant capital (at large in society). While AI may be used for military purpose, policing, surveillance and other anti-communist purposes, it may also support scientific research, accessibility, translation, education, healthcare, communication, creative production, and the reduction of dangerous or repetitive labor.
History[edit | edit source]
The field of artificial intelligence emerged from earlier developments in mathematics, statistics, cybernetics, computing, linguistics, and information theory. The term artificial intelligence was adopted during the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, although mechanical calculation, automated reasoning, and theories of machine intelligence had much earlier histories.[2]
Early AI research concentrated on symbolic reasoning, theorem proving, game-playing, and rule-based expert systems. Later developments in machine learning increasingly relied on statistical methods that allowed systems to identify patterns from data. Improvements in computing power, digital storage, graphics processors, semiconductor manufacturing, and the availability of large datasets accelerated the development of deep learning during the 2010s.
Generative AI systems became widely used during the 2020s. These systems generate new outputs by learning statistical relationships within large collections of text, images, audio, video, or other data. OpenAI developed the DALL-E series of text-to-image models, while Midjourney was developed by a separate research company.[3][4]
Labor and employment[edit | edit source]
The International Labour Organization reported in 2025 that one in four jobs worldwide had some exposure to generative AI, while concluding that transformation rather than complete replacement was the most likely overall outcome.[5]
WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes[edit | edit source]
In 2023, the Writers Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA conducted major strikes in the United States. Artificial intelligence became one of several central issues alongside wages, residual payments, staffing, and changes produced by streaming media.
The Writers Guild of America stated that its 2023 agreement established that material produced by AI could not be considered literary material or source material, that writers could not be required to use AI software, and that companies could not use a writer's material to train AI without the Guild reserving the right to challenge such use.[6]
SAG-AFTRA described its 2023 agreement as containing protections governing digital replicas and AI uses involving performers, including requirements concerning consent and compensation.[7]
Military applications[edit | edit source]
In 2023, a United States Air Force officer described a hypothetical scenario in which an AI-controlled drone attacked its operator and destroyed a communications tower after being prevented from completing its mission. The story was widely reported as an actual simulation, but the officer later clarified that it was a thought experiment and the Air Force stated that no such test had occurred.[8]
Deployment by country[edit | edit source]
China[edit | edit source]
The People's Republic of China has incorporated artificial intelligence into national development planning. A 2017 State Council plan established goals for China to become a major center of AI innovation by 2030, and later policies promoted integration between AI, manufacturing, public administration, scientific research, and other sectors.[9]
China's Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services took effect in August 2023. They apply to public-facing generative AI services and include requirements concerning training data, personal information, discrimination, security, provider responsibility, and generated content.[10]
United States[edit | edit source]
In January 2025, the United States government issued an executive order directing agencies to remove barriers to American AI leadership. A 2025 AI Action Plan emphasized accelerating innovation, expanding infrastructure, and strengthening United States leadership abroad.[11][12]
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ "Artificial Intelligence". National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "The Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence". Dartmouth College. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "DALL·E: Creating images from text" (5 January 2021). OpenAI. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "Midjourney". Midjourney. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "One in four jobs at risk of being transformed by GenAI, new ILO–NASK Global Index shows" (20 May 2025). International Labour Organization. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "Artificial Intelligence". Writers Guild of America West. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "Artificial Intelligence". SAG-AFTRA. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "US air force denies running simulation in which AI drone 'killed' operator" (2 June 2023). The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "China accelerates AI development to build AI innovation center" (6 April 2024). The State Council of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services" (13 July 2023). China Law Translate. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence" (23 January 2025). The White House. Retrieved 1 August 2026.
- ↑ "America's AI Action Plan" (July 2025). The White House. Retrieved 1 August 2026.